BodySite vs. Cerbo: Which Is Better for Your Practice?

Cerbo is an established clinical-grade EHR for functional medicine physicians — known for deep clinical charting and a large integration library built up over years, and priced accordingly. BodySite is the engagement-and-education platform with practice management and EMR built in — its charting is highly configurable too (blank templates, custom forms, and scribe notes built from scratch or your own), at a fraction of the cost. Cerbo appeals most to physicians who want the most exhaustive clinical documentation and integration depth. BodySite wins on everything patient-facing — ready-made education, a full native app, and a social community layer — and typically costs about a third as much per provider.

BodySite vs. Cerbo at a glance

BodySiteCerbo
Starting price$69–$199/mo flat; unlimited clients from $159/mo~$269/mo per prescribing provider*
Patient education content100+ done-for-you plans & courses, includedNone (handouts / file sharing)
Forms, questionnaires & consents55+ ready-made, out of the box (fully customizable) or bring/build your ownBuild-your-own / customizable
Native patient + provider appFull app, included on every planWeb portal (no native app)
Group & community engagementGroup visits (up to 50), group chats, forumsNot offered
TelehealthIncluded; group visits & webinars up to 50Included (1:1 video, integrated)
Charting & configurabilityHighly configurable: blank templates, custom forms & scribe notes, AI scribe integratedVery deep, mature physician charting; highly configurable
Labs & integrationsLabs via Fullscript & Rupa (Quest & many)55+ integrations (labs, Shopify, supplement dispensaries)
ePrescribe$40/mo add-on + $99 setup (EPCS included)Bundled into the (premium) prescribing-provider seat

*Cerbo does not publish pricing; figure is a third-party estimate per prescribing provider. Confirm directly.

Where Cerbo is stronger

Credit where it’s due: Cerbo is one of the most mature, deeply built clinical EHRs in functional medicine. Years of physician-driven development show in the depth of its clinical tooling, it carries 55+ integrations including labs and supplement dispensaries, and ePrescribing with EPCS is bundled into the prescribing-provider seat rather than a separate add-on. Both platforms let you build custom charting from a blank slate — that’s not the difference — but for a physician-led practice that wants the most exhaustive, battle-tested clinical documentation and integration ecosystem, and has budget for a premium EHR, Cerbo is a serious tool. Just know the trade-off reviewers cite: charts start blank until you invest heavily in building templates, and the learning curve (and cost) is real.

Where BodySite is stronger

BodySite owns the entire patient-facing layer Cerbo doesn’t attempt — and it’s far more than a content library. You start with 100+ ready-made care plans, courses, and lesson programs — plus 55+ forms, questionnaires, and consents out of the box — delivered automatically through daily drip emails and in-app lessons, videos, recipes, and exercises, so intake is configured and patients are guided through their care day by day rather than handed a portal login.

Around that content sits a complete engagement and communication system in a native app patients open daily: they track food by photo or barcode, log body metrics and activity, keep a journal, complete forms, and follow their plan. You message both ways with photos, videos, links, and attachments, send care instructions and reminders, share documents, and run one-on-one or group telehealth visits and webinars for up to 50. And it’s genuinely social — group chats and discussion forums let patients support one another and stay accountable between visits. Cerbo gives patients a web portal; BodySite gives them a place they live in daily.

Then there’s price. Solos on BodySite can start at $69 — and at the practice level, the gap widens fast. BodySite’s Scale tier is $199/month flat for the whole practice: unlimited patients and seats for up to four providers. Cerbo charges per prescribing provider — third-party trackers put it around $228–$269 each per month — so a four-provider practice runs roughly $900–$1,075 a month, often plus a one-time setup fee north of $1,000. Same four providers, and BodySite is a flat $199 for everyone. You’re also productive on day one instead of building templates for weeks.

Both are complete platforms — the common ground

Both are full EMR and practice-management systems: charting and encounter notes, scheduling, billing and payments, intake forms, and lab integrations. Both are built for functional and integrative care. The decision is depth-of-charting versus breadth-of-engagement — and how much you value ready-made patient content, a real app, and price over maximum documentation configurability.

A note on the Cerbo–OptiMantra merger

In December 2025, Cerbo and OptiMantra merged under a new CEO to combine their platforms. That can be a good thing: more resources and a bigger roadmap. But consolidations also bring change worth weighing before you commit — product roadmaps shift as two systems are integrated, plans and pricing often get restructured, and migrations can be disruptive for existing customers. It’s fair to ask the combined company directly where the product and pricing are headed. BodySite is independently owned and single-focused, with a simple, flat pricing model — flat tiers, unlimited clients, no per-provider fees or transaction cuts.

Choose Cerbo if…

  • You’re a physician practice that lives in deep, customized functional-medicine charting.
  • You need 55+ niche integrations, including labs and supplement dispensaries.
  • You want the most exhaustive clinical documentation and integration ecosystem, and have budget for a premium clinical EHR.

Choose BodySite if…

  • You want patients educated, tracked, and engaged daily — not just charted.
  • You want 100+ ready-made care plans and a full native app for patients and providers.
  • You want group visits, group chats, and community forums, not just a web portal.
  • Budget matters: the Scale tier is $199/month flat for the whole practice — unlimited patients and up to four providers — versus Cerbo’s per-prescribing-provider pricing that can run $900–$1,075/month for the same four seats.
  • You want configurable charting that’s useful on day one — blank templates, custom forms, and an integrated AI scribe — not weeks of setup.

Frequently asked questions

Is Cerbo or BodySite better for a functional medicine practice?

Cerbo offers very deep, mature physician charting and a large integration ecosystem for functional medicine. BodySite offers highly configurable charting too — blank templates and custom forms and scribe notes — plus complete patient education, engagement, and a social community layer, with practice management included, at roughly a third of the cost. Some physician practices even run both: Cerbo for charting depth, BodySite for the patient experience.

Does Cerbo have a patient app?

Cerbo provides a practice-branded web portal; a native patient mobile app is not documented. BodySite includes a full native iPhone and Android app for patients and providers on every plan, with food, body, and activity tracking, journaling, messaging, and group community features.

How much cheaper is BodySite than Cerbo?

Cerbo doesn’t publish pricing, but third-party trackers put it around $269/month per prescribing provider. BodySite’s top tier is $199/month with unlimited clients, and it starts at $69 — so for most practices BodySite costs a fraction of Cerbo, especially as you add providers.

Try BodySite free for 30 days — every plan includes the full patient education library, the native patient app, and telehealth. Or watch a demo to see it in action.

← All BodySite alternatives & comparisons

Compare BodySite with:
Practice Better  ·  OptiMantra  ·  Healthie  ·  Cerbo  ·  SimplePractice  ·  Jane App  ·  Charm  ·  Elation